Ringing Scheme logo

Project partners

British Trust for Ornithology logo
JNCC logo
National Parks and Wildlife Service logo

Project partners

British Trust for Ornithology logo
JNCC logo
National Parks and Wildlife Service logo

Additional biometrics

Listed are some additional biometric measurements which we recommend taking on species if there is sufficient time during normal ringing procedures. Measurements that are highlighted in bold are either essential for determining the corresponding trait or there is a published analysis which requires all the measurements listed to be taken. Those measurements not highlighted may still be useful and it would be valuable to build a larger sample in the ringing database. We would welcome anyone to contact us with any additional biometric measurements known to be important for a species or any provisionally useful measurements in order to encourage more ringers to collect additional data. Information on how to take some of the measurements meantioned below can be found on the taking measurements page.

With grateful thanks to Chris du Feu for initiating this work.

Species

Measurement

Criteria for

Arctic Skua

Tail difference; Wing length + Weight

Age1; Sex (ad.)2

Arctic Tern

Total head length

Sex (ad.)2

Bar-tailed Godwit

Bill length (F)

Sex1,2

Bewick’s Swan

Toe length

Sex (ad.)1

Bittern

Wing length + Bill length (F)

Sex1,2

Black-headed Gull

Total head length + Bill depth (G)

Sex1,2

Black-tailed Godwit

Wing length + Bill length (F)

Sex, Race1,2

Buzzard

Tarsus width (lateral point) + Hind claw length

Sex (pul. >26 days)1,2

Chough

Wing length + Weight

Sex (ad.)2

Common Gull

Total head length

Sex1,2

Common Sandpiper

Total head length

Sex1

Common Tern

Total head length + Weight

Sex (ad.)1,2

Coot

Tarsus length (min.)

Sex (ad.)1,2

Cormorant

Bill depth (min.); Gular pouch angle

Sex1,2; Race1,2

Curlew

Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex1,2

Curlew Sandpiper

Bill length (F)

Sex1,2

Dunlin

Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.)

Race1,2

Fulmar

Bill length (feathers at base of culmen to tip); Bill depth (gonys)

Sex1,2

Golden Eagle

Culmen length + Hind claw length

Sex1,2

Goshawk

Tarsus length (min.)

Sex1,2

Great Black-back Gull

Total head length; Bill length (F) + Bill depth (gonys)

Sex (ad.)1,2

Great Crested Grebe

Bill length (gape to tip) + Bill depth (proximate point of nostril)

Sex1,2

Great Skua

Total head length + Tarsus (min.)

Sex (ad.)2

Great Spotted Woodpecker

Bill length (S) + Bill Depth (N)

Race5

Grey Heron

Bill length (F)

Sex (ad.)1,2

Hen Harrier

Bill length (C)

Sex (imm.)2

Herring Gull

Total head length; Bill length (F) + Bill depth (gonys)

Sex (ad. argenteus only)1, 2

Jackdaw

Wing length + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex (ad.)2

Kittiwake

Total head length

Sex1,2

Lapwing

Crest length

Sex (ad.)1,2

Lesser Black-back Gull

Total head length; Bill length (F) + Bill depth (gonys)

Sex (ad. graellsii only)1, 2

Little Egret

Wing length + Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.); Nape feather length

Sex2; Age1,2

Little Stint

Bill length (F)

Sex1

Manx Shearwater

Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex2

Marsh Harrier

Toe span; Bill length(C) + Weight

Sex (pul.)1; Sex (imm.)1,2

Marsh/Reed Warbler

Wing formula

Species2,6

Moorhen

Tarsus & toe length

Sex (ad.)1,2

Mute Swan

Tarsus length (min.)

Sex (juv.)1

Osprey

Bill length (C) + Tail length; Forearm length + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex (ad.); Sex (pul. 40-73 days)2

Oystercatcher

Bill length (F) + Bill depth (D) + Bill tip shape

Sex1,2, Foraging Strategy8

Pectoral Sandpiper

Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex3

Pipits (all species)

Hind Claw Length

Species2,6

Puffin

No. of bill grooves

Age1,2

Purple Sandpiper

Bill length (F)

Sex1,2

Red Kite

Weight + Tail length

Sex1,2

Red-necked Grebe

Bill length (gape to tip) + Bill depth (proximate point of nostril)

Sex1

Redshank

Wing length + Bill length (F) + Tarsus & toe length

Race1,2

Red-throated Diver

Wing length + Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex1,2

Ring-necked Parakeet

Wing length + Bill length (S) + No. of yellow underwing coverts

Sex2,4

Rook

Wing length + Bill length (S)

Sex (ad.)2

Roseate Tern

Total head length

Sex (ad.)2

Shag

Bill depth (min.)

Sex1,2

Siskin

Length of black on TF5

Sex (juv.)2

Skylark

Wing formula

Sex2

Sparrowhawk

Bill length (C) + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex1,2

Swallow

Tail difference

Sex2,6

Tawny Owl

Wing length + Weight

Sex1,2

Temminck’s Stint

Bill length (F)

Sex (ad.)2

Water Rail

Bill length (F) + Tarsus length (min.)

Sex1,2

Waxwing

Length of yellow on tip of tail; Number of red tips on secondaries

Sex2

Whooper Swan

Toe length

Sex (ad.)1

Willow W./Chiffchaff

Wing formula

Species2,6

Woodcock

Tail length + Bill length (F)

Sex1,2

Woodpigeon

Tail length + Wing length + Tibia length; Total head length

Sex1,2

Wren

Wing length + Total head length

Sex2,7

References

1 Baker, J. (2016). Identification of European non-passerines: BTO Guide. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, UK.

2 Demongin L. (2016). Identification Guide to Birds in the Hand. Beauregard-Vendon.

3 Prater, A.J., Marchant, J.H. & Vuorinen, J. (1977). Guide to the identification and ageing of Holarctic waders. British Trust for Ornithology,  Thetford, UK.

4 Butler, C.J. & Butler, A. (2004). Sexing and ageing Rose-ringed parakeets Psittacula krameri in Britain. Ringing & Migration 22, 7-12, DOI: 10.1080/03078698.2004.9674305.

5 Smith, K. W. (2010). Continental great spotted woodpeckers Dendrocopos major in Britain – further analyses of wing‐length data. Ringing & Migration 25, 65-70, DOI: 10.1080/03078698.2010.9674419.

6 Svennson, L. (1992). Identification guide to European passerines, 4th ed.  Svennson L., Stockholm, Sweden.

7 Sweeney, J.J. & Tatner, P. (1996). Sexing Wrens Troglodytes troglodytes indigenus using morphological measurements and discriminant analysis. Bird Study 43, 342-350, DOI: 10.1080/00063659609461027.

8‑ van de Pol, M. et al. (2009). Oystercatchers’ bill shapes as a proxy for diet specialization: more differentiation than meets the eye. Ardea, 97, 335–347.



Related content