Linking climate warming and land conversion to species’ range changes across Great Britain
Author(s): Suggitt, A.J., Wheatley, C.J., Aucott, P., Beale, C.M., Fox, R., Hill, J.K., Isaac, N.J.B., Martay, B., Southall, H., Thomas, C.D., Walker, K.J. & Auffret , A.G.
Published: October 2023
Journal: Nature Communications Volume: 14
Article No.: 6759
Digital Identifier No. (DOI): 10.1038/s41467-023-42475-0
Habitat loss and climate change are two major threats to global biodiversity. How these two threats interact to drive biodiversity changes is less well understood. In this study, the authors examined changes in bird, butterfly, moth and plant distributions across the UK over the past 75 years to investigate how species respond to these combined threats.
The most notable changes over the past 75 years have been an increase in temperature and a loss of roughly 90% of lowland meadow and pasture, mainly converted to arable farmland and improved grassland. Across all UK species analysed, the combined impact of climate change and land conversion increased extinction risk for 12% of species, while reduced extinction risk for 40%, with over half of species showing increases in range linked to rising temperatures. It should be noted that many of the species most negatively impacted by land-use and climate change may be too rare to be included in the analysis, skewing the results towards the more successful species.
Interestingly, the results showed that for most species, the impacts of climate and land-use change did not interact: land-use changes rarely influenced how species responded to climate change and vice versa. For species impacted by both drivers, they were almost always additive effects, with species either responding well to both changes or badly to both changes.
The results show the diversity in species’ responses to drivers of change, highlighting the importance of biological recording and the inclusion of species-level information when devising plans to maintain biodiversity. They also suggest that accounting for interactions between land-use and climate change may be less important than predicted.
Share this page