Flexibility in the timing of post-breeding moult in passerines in the UK

Flexibility in the timing of post-breeding moult in passerines in the UK

Ibis, 2015

Citation

Morrison, C.A., Baillie, S.R., Clark, J.A., Johnston, A., Leech, D.I. & Robinson, R.A. 2015. Flexibility in the timing of post-breeding moult in passerines in the UK. Ibis 157: 340–350. doi:10.1111/ibi.12234
Bullfinch pair and young in nest, by John Harding / BTO

Arolwg

BTO research has used information collected by bird ringers to investigate large-scale differences and flexibility in the timing of feather moult across 15 passerine species that breed in the UK. Different moult strategies were found between migrant and resident species, alongside within-species regional variation in moulting schedules.

In more detail

Most passerines replace their 10 primary flight feathers in sequence after breeding, and ringers are encouraged to score the progression of this moult in the birds they catch. This study found significant differences in when species begin to moult, with Blue Tits, which commence this process earliest in the season, replacing feathers more than two months before Bullfinches, the latest moulting species. Data from the Nest Record Scheme showed that these differences can be completely explained by the time at which species finish breeding, and consequently, species that produce only a single-brood each year start moult earlier in the season than multi-brooded species.

There was also significant variation in how long species take to complete their post-breeding moult, with long-distance migrants replacing their feathers at a faster rate than the resident species. Migrants achieved this by moulting a greater number of feathers simultaneously than residents. For example, migratory Whitethroats moutled faster than any other species in the study, replacing their primary feathers in about two months by moulting an average of three and a half feathers per wing at one time. Conversely, resident House Sparrows, the slowest moulting species, took nearly four months to complete their moult by only moulting two feathers simultaneously. It is likely that these differences in moult strategies are governed by the constraints each species faces at the end of the breeding season. Residents are unlikely to travel very far from breeding grounds during the winter and can consequently take their time over moult, but a rapid post-breeding moult, although energetically costly, may allow migratory species to undertake their perilous southerly journeys as early and quickly as possible.

Within species, there were clear regional differences in the commencement of moult that seemed to influence moult duration. This was particularly apparent in the multi-brooded species, in which moult started later but progressed faster in southern Britain (where the duration of the breeding season was longer) than in the north. This finding demonstrates flexibility within birds’ moult schedules so that a later end to breeding can be compensated for by a faster post-breeding moult. Such flexibility might allow species to change their moult schedules in response to prevailing breeding season conditions. However, this may be constrained by the requirement to complete post-breeding moult prior to migration or the onset of winter, which may be especially limiting for later nesting species.

Abstract

Higher temperatures resulting from climate change have led to predictions that the duration of the breeding season of many temperate bird species may be changing. However, the extent to which breeding seasons can be altered will also depend on the degree of flexibility in processes occurring at other points in the annual cycle. In particular, plasticity in the timing of post-breeding moult (PBM) could facilitate changes in the timing of key events throughout the annual cycle, but little is known about the level of within- and between-species plasticity in PBM. As part of the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) Ringing Scheme, many ringers routinely record moult scores of flight feathers, and these can be used to provide information on the annual progression of PBM for a range of species. Here we use ringing data to investigate patterns of PBM in 15 passerines, as well as data from the BTO Nest Record Scheme to relate these differences to the timing of breeding of these species across the UK. We find considerable variation in both the mean start (19 May–29 July) and duration (66–111 days) of PBM between species, but find no evidence that species starting PBM later in the season complete it any faster. However, there is considerable within-species variation in PBM, particularly for multi-brooded species; PBM starts later and is completed in less time when the duration of the breeding season (difference between first and last nests) is longer. This implies that a later end to breeding can be compensated for by faster PBM, and that advances in breeding could lead to earlier and slower PBM. Our findings suggest that adaptation of PBM in response to climate-mediated changes in the timing and duration of the breeding season is possible. However, the requirement to complete PBM prior to migration or the onset of winter might constrain the extent to which breeding seasons can lengthen, especially for later nesting species.

Staff author(s)

Default Image

Cat Morrison

Default Image

Jacquie Clark

Default Image

Ali Johnston

The BTO Ringing and Nest Record Schemes are funded by a partnership of the British Trust for Ornithology, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (on behalf of Natural England, Natural Resources Wales, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Department of the Environment Northern Ireland). The Ringing Scheme is also funded by The National Parks and Wildlife Service (Ireland) and the ringers themselves. The authors thanks the generous donations from ringers and friends of ringing which allowed this work to be undertaken.