House Sparrow

House Sparrow

Passer domesticus
House Sparrow, John Harding

Introduction

Cheeping flocks of House Sparrow once tumbled from untidy nests and wallowed in urban dust baths. Now the species is in decline and has been on the UK Red List since 2002.

Colonial nesters, the male House Sparrow is resplendent with grey head and black bib, while the female and young are more uniformly brown. Very much associated with the dwellings of man whether urban or rural, House Sparrows enjoy a mixed diet, and in the summer will readily forage for insects in hedgerows and meadows providing they do not have to fly too far from their nests.

House Sparrows are found year round throughout Britain & Ireland, except for on the highest peaks. The species has declined in the UK since the mid-1970s, with losses most notable in the south and east.

  • Our Trends Explorer gives you the latest insight into how this species' population is changing.
House Sparrow, John Harding

Key Stats

Status
Common
Common
Weight
Weight
27.3g
Eggs
Eggs
4-5
BTO Records
BTO Records
8.2m records
Population and distribution stats for:
Population Change
Population Change
Stable 1995–2022
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
-3.3% contraction

Identification

Curated resources to aid in the identification of House Sparrow

ID Videos

This section features BTO training videos headlining this species, or featuring it as a potential confusion species.

Sparrows

#BirdSongBasics: House Sparrow and Dunnock

GBW: House Sparrow and Dunnock

Songs and Calls

Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of House Sparrow, provided by xeno-canto contributors.

Song:

Call:

Begging call:

Other:

Movement

Information about House Sparrow movements and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.

Britain & Ireland movement

View a summary of recoveries in the Online Ringing Report

Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

Dots show the foreign destinations of birds ringed in Britain & Ireland, and the origins of birds ringed overseas that were subsequently recaptured, resighted or found dead in Britain & Ireland. Dot colours indicate the time of year that the species was present at the location.

  • Winter (Nov-Feb)
  • Spring (Mar-Apr)
  • Summer (May-Jul)
  • Autumn (Aug-Oct)
Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

European movements

EuroBirdPortal uses birdwatcher's records, such as those logged in BirdTrack to map the flows of birds as they arrive and depart Europe. See maps for this species here.

Biology

Lifecycle and body size information for House Sparrow, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.

Productivity and Nesting

Nesting timing

Average (range) fo first clutch laying dates
14 May (27 Mar-11 Jul)
Typical (exceptional) number of broods
2-3(4)

Egg measurements

Typical length x width
22x16 mm
Mass (% shell)
2.9g (7%)

Clutch Size

Typical number
5-4 eggs
Average ±1 standard deviation
4.15±0.84 eggs
Observed minimum and maximum
2-7 eggs

Incubation

Incubation by
Female
Typical duration
15-12 days
Observed average ±1 standard deviation
13.61±2.43 days
Observed minimum and maximum
9.5-18.5 days

Fledging

Type of chick
Altricial, naked
Typical duration
17-14.5 days
Observed average ±1 standard deviation
15.55±2 days
Minimum and maximum
12-19 days
N=2973, Source
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Survival and Longevity

Survival is shown as the proportion of birds surviving from one year to the next and is derived from bird ringing data. It can also be used to estimate how long birds typically live.

View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report.

lifespan

Typical life expectancy of bird reaching breeding age
3 years with breeding typically at 1 year
Maximum age from a ringed bird
12 years, 12 days (set in 1978)

Survival of adults

All adults
0.571±0.009

Survival of juveniles

All juveniles
0.489±0.017 (in first year)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Biometrics

Wing length and body weights are from live birds (source).

Wing length

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
74.2±2.6 mm
(70-78 mm, N=3221)
All adults
77.1±2.4 mm
(73-81 mm, N=15876)
Female
75.5±1.9 mm
Male
78.2±2 mm

Body weight

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
74.2±2.6 mm
(70-78 mm, N=3221)
All adults
77.1±2.4 mm
(73-81 mm, N=15876)
Female
75.5±1.9 mm
Male
78.2±2 mm
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Ring Size

B

Classification, names and codes

Taxonomy, names and species codes for House Sparrow

Classification and Codes

  • Order: Passeriformes
  • Family: Passeridae
  • Scientific name: Passer domesticus
  • Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
  • BTO 2-letter code: HS
  • BTO 5-letter code: HOUSP
  • Euring code number: 15910

Alternate species names

  • Catalan: pardal comú
  • Czech: vrabec domácí
  • Danish: Gråspurv
  • Dutch: Huismus
  • Estonian: koduvarblane
  • Finnish: varpunen
  • French: Moineau domestique
  • Gaelic: Gealbhonn
  • German: Haussperling
  • Hungarian: házi veréb
  • Icelandic: Gráspör
  • Irish: Gealbhan Binne
  • Italian: Passera Europea
  • Latvian: majas zvirbulis
  • Lithuanian: naminis žvirblis
  • Norwegian: Gråspurv
  • Polish: wróbel (zwyczajny)
  • Portuguese: pardal
  • Slovak: vrabec domový
  • Slovenian: domaci vrabec
  • Spanish: Gorrión común
  • Swedish: gråsparv
  • Welsh: Aderyn y Tô
  • English folkname(s): Speug, Spadger

Research

Interpretation and scientific publications about House Sparrow from BTO scientists.

Causes of Change and Solutions

Causes of change

There is evidence that changes in survival rates due to lack of food resources, because of agricultural intensification, are the main driver of House Sparrow declines in farmland, although changes in breeding performance may also have played a role. Different processes have affected House Sparrows in towns, where breeding performance could be the most important driver of declines, although the evidence for the ecological causes is less clear.

Further information on causes of change

A temporary drop in first-year survival coincided with the period of steepest decline, but changes in breeding performance, especially reduced nest failure rates at the chick stage, appear to have driven a levelling-off in the long-term population trend (Freeman & Crick 2002). Over the period since 1968, brood size has decreased (see above) but there has also been a major decrease in nest failure rates at the egg and chick stages, so the number of fledglings per breeding attempt has shown a net increase. Further evidence for the role of changing survival in House Sparrow declines has been provided by Hole et al. (2002), who found no evidence of significant differences in most breeding-ecology parameters in declining and stable populations in a farm-scale comparison, while Siriwardena et al. (1999) found that national survival rates were lower during the period of decline in the CBC index. That survival, especially of adult birds, appeared to make the largest contribution to annual population change was also found by Robinson et al. (2014). Crick & Siriwardena (2002), using NRS data, showed that breeding performance per nesting attempt had increased and was positively correlated with population growth rate in the wider countryside (although there was no such correlation in gardens). Analysis of Garden BirdWatch data found higher seasonal peak counts, however, relative to pre-breeding numbers, in the north and west of Britain than in the east and south where population decline is strongest, thus indicating that breeding productivity is influencing population trends (Morrison et al. 2014).

There appear to be different processes affecting urban and agricultural populations. On farmland, changes in farming practices due to intensification of agriculture and the tidying of farmyards have reduced the seed available to farmland populations of House Sparrows during winter, which has resulted in a reduction in survival rates (Siriwardena et al. 1999, Chamberlain et al. 2007, Hole 2001), specifically of first-year birds (Crick et al. 2002). This is supported by a positive effect of supplementary seed in winter on farmland House Sparrow population trends in a landscape-scale experiment in East Anglia (Siriwardena et al. 2007), and a similar positive effect from the provision of areas of seed rich habitat on farms under agri-environment schemes in Northern Ireland (Coulhoun et al. 2017). House Sparrows have probably been deleteriously affected by the decrease in the amount of grain spilt around farm buildings and during the process of harvesting since the 1970s (O'Connor & Shrubb 1986). The move towards autumn-sowing of cereals has meant that cereal stubble has become much rarer, reducing food resources over winter, although Robinson et al. (2001) found no influence of spring-sown cereal on House Sparrow abundance in predominantly pastoral farmland. Conversely, breeding performance is worse where there is more spring cereal (Crick & Siriwardena 2002), although this may reflect geographical associations with areas where spring sowing remains widespread in the UK (the west and north) rather than direct effects of cropping.

Recent declines have been particularly severe in urban areas (Robinson et al. 2005b, Chamberlain et al. 2007). Increased predation by cats and Sparrowhawks, lack of nest sites, loss of food supplies, pollution and disease have all been cited as factors possibly depressing populations in towns (Crick et al. 2002), but supporting evidence for these is mixed. Within urban areas, Shaw et al. (2008) reviewed available evidence and hypothesised that House Sparrows have disappeared from more affluent areas, where changes to habitat structure such as planting of ornamental shrubs and increased demand for off-street parking is likely to reduce the amount of habitat available to House Sparrows and influenced foraging and predation risk. The conversion of private gardens to continuous housing has also had a negative effect on House Sparrow abundan

Vincent (2005) found that annual productivity among suburban and rural human habitation in Leicestershire was lower than that measured on farmland House Sparrows in Oxfordshire, the main cause of the difference being starvation of chicks. Low body masses at fledging, and consequently low post-fledging survival, were also recorded in Leicestershire. Although only a two-year study, Peach et al. (2008) measured reproductive success in a declining House Sparrow population along an urbanisation gradient in Leicester and also found that a year in which reproductive success was too low to sustain the population was characterised by lower chick survival and body mass at fledging (a predictor of post-fledging survival). However, there is no direct evidence that invertebrate food supplies have declined in these areas and variation in survival has not been investigated. Supplying mealworms for garden-nesting House Sparrows in Greater London substantially improved breeding success but did not increase nesting density (Peach et al. 2014, 2015). Supplying unlimited high energy seed throughout the year did not affect overwinter or survival or population size, suggesting that food availability was not currently a limiting factor for suburban sparrows (Peach et al. 2018).

Analysis of cross-colony abundance in Greater London found that numbers were higher in areas with more seed rich habitat and low levels of nitrogen dioxide air pollution, although further evidence about the effects of air pollution are needed to confirm whether it may have contributed to the decline (Peach et al. 2018). There is evidence, however, that avian malaria may have contributed to the decline in London, where infection was found at very high prevalence and survival rates were negatively correlated with infection rates (Dadam et al. 2019).

Negative correlations between indices of Sparrowhawk presence during its post-organochlorine increase and House Sparrow abundance from the Garden Bird Feeding Survey have been interpreted as evidence that increasing predation rates are depressing House Sparrow populations (Bell et al. 2010). However, more sophisticated analyses of large-scale and extensive national monitoring data provide no evidence that House Sparrow population declines were linked to increases in Sparrowhawks (Newson et al. 2010b).

Information about conservation actions

The main driver of the decline in farmland is believed to be a reduction of food resources on farms and in farmyards as a result of agricultural intensification, and therefore conservation actions and agri-environment policies which increase food availability are likely to benefit House Sparrows in rural areas. Research has confirmed positive effects from the provision of supplementary seed in winter (Siriwardena et al. 2007) and from the provision of areas of seed-rich habitat on farms (Colhoun et al. 2017).

The evidence relating to the declines in urban areas is less clear and further research is still needed. It may be that a number of different causes are affecting populations (see Causes of Change section, above). Therefore, a variety of different actions could be needed to reverse the declines, and actions that have increased numbers at some colonies will not necessarily be successful elsewhere. Providing supplementary food during winter may help declining populations (Hole et al. 2002) and actions to increase densities of invertebrates away from major roads may help improve breeding productivity (Peach et al. 2008). Actions to maintain and improve habitat in urban areas could also help, including the planting of native shrubs in gardens (Wilkinson 2010), retaining natural gardens and green spaces rather than paving, and ensuring suitable nesting locations are available (e.g. by providing nest boxes). Other possible causes which could have contributed to the decline include avian malaria (Dadam et al. 2009), for which encouraging improved garden feeder hygiene is important; and air pollution, which may be more difficult to resolve without wider scale policies.

Publications (5)

Drivers of the changing abundance of European birds at two spatial scales

Author: Gregory, R.D., Eaton, M.A., Burfield, I.J., Grice, P.V., Howard, C., Klvaňová, A., Noble, D., Šilarová, E., Staneva, A., Stephens, P.A., Willis, S.G., Woodward, I.D. & Burns, F.

Published: 2023

Understanding how human activities drive biodiversity change at different spatial scales is a key question for conservation practitioners and decision-makers. While we have a good understanding of the primary causes of observed biodiversity declines – which include land-use change, climate change, pollution, and the over-exploitation of species – we still struggle to measure and detect biodiversity change in robust and meaningful ways.

29.05.23

Papers

View on journal website

The State of the UK's Birds 2020

Author: Burns, F., Eaton, M.A., Balmer, D.E., Banks, A., Caldow, R., Donelan, J.L., Douse, A., Duigan, C., Foster, S., Frost, T., Grice, P.V., Hall, C., Hanmer, H.J., Harris, S.J., Johnstone, I., Lindley, P., McCulloch, N., Noble, D.G., Risely, K., Robinson, R.A. & Wotton, S.

Published: 2020

The State of UK’s Birds reports have provided an periodic overview of the status of the UK’s breeding and non-breeding bird species in the UK and its Overseas Territories since 1999. This year’s report highlights the continuing poor fortunes of the UK’s woodland birds, and the huge efforts of BTO volunteers who collect data.

17.12.20

Reports State of Birds in the UK

Download PDF

Avian malaria-mediated population decline of a widespread iconic bird species

Author: Dadam, D., Robinson, R.A., Clements, A., Peach, W.J., Bennett, M., Rowcliffe, J.M. & Cunningham, A.A.

Published: 2019

England’s House Sparrow population fell by 70% between 1977 and 2016, and this once ubiquitous species is now absent from many urban areas. New research involving the BTO has found evidence that malarial parasites may be linked to this species’ decline.

17.07.19

Papers

The composition of British bird communities is associated with long-term garden bird feeding

Author: Plummer, K.E., Risely, K., Toms, M.P. & Siriwardena, G.M.

Published: 2019

Newly published research from BTO shows how the popular pastime of feeding the birds is significantly shaping garden bird communities in Britain. The populations of several species of garden birds have grown in number, and the diversity of species visiting feeders has also increased.

21.05.19

Papers

The risk of extinction for birds in Great Britain

Author: Stanbury, A., Brown, A., Eaton, M., Aebischer, N., Gillings, S., Hearn, R., Noble, D., Stroud, D. & Gregory, R.

Published: 2017

The UK has lost seven species of breeding birds in the last 200 years. Conservation efforts to prevent this from happening to other species, both in the UK and around the world, are guided by species’ priorities lists, which are often informed by data on range, population size and the degree of decline or increase in numbers. These are the sorts of data that BTO collects through its core surveys.

01.09.17

Papers

More Evidence

More evidence from Conservation Evidence.com

Partners

Birdfacts is based on data collected by volunteers participating in surveys that are organised and funded by BTO, RSPB, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, JNCC and other partners.
Find a Species

Search by common or scientific name

Or view the alphabetical list of UK bird species